久久国产精品99精品国产987 ,老少配xx丰满老熟妇,快播看片毛网站

免费日韩中文字幕高清电影,久久久中文字幕日本无吗,鲁死你资源站亚洲av,蜜桃视频资源在线观看,久久毛片久久,

zui新托?？记?| 獨立題重復舊題，學術(shù)討論寫作出“新題”

發(fā)布時間：2025/04/08 16:52:17

瀏覽次數(shù)：

近期，托?？荚嚨目记槌尸F(xiàn)出一些顯著的趨勢和變化，尤其是在寫作部分。根據(jù)zui新的考情分析，獨立寫作部分的題目重復率較高，而學術(shù)討論寫作則出現(xiàn)了不少“新題”。這些變化對考生的備考策略提出了新的要求。

#01 獨立口語思路解析

第1套

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is impolite for tourists to take photos of local people without asking for permission?

是否同意：游客不經(jīng)允許就給當?shù)厝伺恼帐遣欢Y貌的。

*本題重復2019年8月24日

答法一：同意

理由一：未經(jīng)允許拍照可能侵犯隱私，尤其是在私人場合；

表述關(guān)鍵詞：Violation of privacy and autonomy. Taking photos of locals without consent disregards their right to control their own image. Many people value privacy, especially in vulnerable or non-public settings.

理由二：它會讓人覺得不被尊重或不舒服；很多人對陌生人未經(jīng)允許就給他們拍照感到不安或?qū)擂?，即使這與文化信仰無關(guān)。

表述關(guān)鍵詞：It can make people feel disrespected or uncomfortable. Many people feel upset or embarrassed when strangers take their photo without asking, even if it’s not about cultural beliefs.

答法二：拍照只是為了記錄真實的文化

理由一：照片捕捉日常生活的真實時刻，為教育或藝術(shù)目的保留文化真實性。

表述關(guān)鍵詞：Photos capture genuine moments of daily life, preserving cultural authenticity for educational or artistic purposes.

理由二：在許多社會中，在公共場合被拍照被認為是正常的；比如，游客用拍攝熱鬧的意大利廣場，包括當?shù)厝肆奶旎蛴貌?，不太可能引起冒犯?/p>

表述關(guān)鍵詞：

A tourist taking a wide-angle shot of a lively Italian piazza, including locals chatting or dining, is unlikely to cause offense.

pexels-photo-5088022.webp.jpg

#02 學術(shù)寫作思路解析

Doctor Achebe:

Today, let's discuss about the effect of different transportation means. Short-distance air travel is increasingly criticized for its environmental impact. Air travel generates significantly higher carbon emissions per passenger than trains, up to10 times more on routes under 500 miles. Critics argue replacing such flights with rail could curb emissions. Should governments ban short flights? Explain why.

Claire:

I think short flights should be banned. Planes emit significantly more carbon per passenger than trains. Switching to trains for short trips, like Paris to Brussels or Tokyo to Osaka, would drastically reduce carbon footprints. Trains also often connect city centers directly, avoiding lengthy airport commutes. Giving priority to rail travel helps promote global sustainability.

Andrew:

Restricting short flights is impractical. People should choose transportation based on their needs. For urgent business trips, medical emergencies, or tight schedules, planes save critical time, which is a 2-hour flight versus a 6-hour train ride. Additionally, not all regions have reliable rail networks; imposing bans could isolate areas lacking alternatives. Instead of restricting options, governments should innovate cleaner fuels for planes.

思路：

贊同Claire，覺得應該禁止短途飛行，因為rail travel享有和air travel一樣甚至更多的好處。

現(xiàn)代的高科技的rail transportation在升級后擁有同樣快速/便捷/優(yōu)質(zhì)的乘坐體驗-無需提前候機和復雜安檢-rail station也不會像airport那樣遠離居住區(qū)-能夠更節(jié)約時間/更有效率-這樣rail travel享有和air travel一樣甚至更多的好處。